Top of Page Describe the organism s used in the study. This includes giving the 1 source supplier or where and how the orgranisms were collected2 typical size weight, length, etc3 how they were handled, fed, and housed before the experiment, 4 how they were handled, fed, and housed during the experiment. In genetics studies include the strains or genetic stocks used. For some studies, age may be an important factor.
Excellent Proofreading and Writing Results The results section is the part of the scientific paper around which everything else is built. The introduction describes why the results needed to be obtained, the methods how they were obtained and the discussion explains the results.
The results section is just a presentation of the data. There should not be any discussion in the results section that goes in the discussion section.
The results need to be presented in enough detail for someone not familiar with the scientific paper to understand them. All the results should be explained in the text of the results section as well as being presented in either figures or tables.
Each result should only be presented once. Do not show the same data in two forms data should be presented as either a table or a figure not both. The text of the results section should introduce each table or figure and provide a summary of the main points from each.
Be simple and clear Present summaries of large data sets means with standard error or deviation Detailed data should be reported in tables or figures and not as lists in the text Only give the data which is relevant to the paper Refer to every table or figure in the text Each figure or table should be identified by a unique number e.
The numbers should be sequential, in the same order as the tables or figures are presented in the text. Discussion In the discussion you should explain your results, how they relate to the literature and any implications they might have for future use.
A good discussion will explain why your results and the whole paper is important. In the discussion you should refer to the literature when explaining and discussing your results.
This should be related to the interpretation of your results and not restating what was said in the introduction when you reviewed the relevant literature. Not repeat information from the results and introduction sections Relate the results to the aims Show how the results agree or disagree with previously published literature Indicate the significance of the results Suggest future work or planned follow-up research Conclusion Often the conclusion will be in the final paragraph of the discussion but it can sometimes be in a separate section.
This is the overall main point or points that you want your readers to remember. They should be clearly stated. The conclusion should not repeat information from the discussion section but restate the main conclusions in a new concise way for your readers, so that they are in no doubt what you have achieved while doing the research presented in your paper.In this paper, I will discuss the issues related to the writing process of a scientific paper.
Specifically, I will focus on the best approaches to start a scientific paper, . The Difficulties of Writing a Discussion Section.
In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics.. That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that.
Feb 12, · Writing manuscripts to describe study outcomes, although not easy, is the main task of an academician. The aim of the present review is to outline the main aspects of writing the discussion section of a manuscript.
Scientific Writing Workshops If you like our articles, try our workshops! Our articles are based on the material from our scientific writing workshops, which cover these and many other topics more thoroughly, with more examples and discussion.
Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid.
Organize the discussion from the general to the specific, linking your findings to the literature, then to theory, then to practice [if appropriate]. The results section is just a presentation of the data. There should not be any discussion in the results section (that goes in the discussion section).
The results need to be presented in enough detail for someone not familiar with the scientific paper to .